MIP 3.1 & 3.2: As-Planned vs As-Built

In this video, I explain the following delay analysis methods in accordance with the AACEI RP 29R-03:

MIP 3.1: As-Planned vs. As-Built, Observational, Single Base, Static, Gross

MIP 3.2: As-Planned vs. As-Built, Observational, Multiple base, Static, Periodic.

➡️ What will you learn?

✅ The Source Validation Protocols (SVPs) and the guidelines of both methods.

✅ How to perform the analysis STEP-BY-STEP.

✅ The advantages, disadvantages, uses and limitations of these methods.

Regards,

Osama Saad, MBA, PMP, PSP, PMI-SP

Learn More!

Check out our comprehensive courses

When planning engineers conduct delay analysis and prepare an extension of time claims, they often

Most modern contracts require the contractor to “mitigate” the delays even though such delays are

Many planning engineers experience confusion regarding the difference between the longest path and the critical

This article will explain everything you need to know about the Planning and Scheduling Professional

13 years of experience in super large construction projects. Skilled in Project Control, Power BI, Delay Analysis and Claims.

Osama Saad, MBA, PMP, PSP, CCP, PMI-SP