In the construction industry, we love numbers. We rely on productivity rates to estimate costs and resources. But what if I told you that standard productivity rates are a myth? Many professionals assume that productivity can be easily defined and applied across different projects, but in reality, it is far more complex.

The truth is, productivity varies widely depending on multiple factors—experience, location, project size, infrastructure, and workforce capabilities. Believing in fixed productivity rates without considering these variables can lead to flawed project estimates, cost overruns, and unrealistic schedules.

To illustrate this, let’s examine two carpenters working under very different conditions.

Example 1: A Carpenter with Limited Experience

Imagine a carpenter who has:

• Only two years of experience working on small residential projects.
• Been working in a developing country with limited resources and outdated tools.
• No exposure to structured workflows or large-scale projects.
• Minimal access to cranes, hoists, or material storage facilities—they often carry materials manually, wasting significant time and effort.

Example 2: A Highly Experienced Carpenter

Now, consider a second carpenter who has:

• Twenty years of experience working on megaprojects in a developed country.
• Worked under tight deadlines with strict quality control.
• Been trained in advanced construction techniques and efficient task execution.
• Access to a strong logistics infrastructure, including tower cranes, hoists, and structured material storage, minimizing unnecessary movement and delays.

Why These Differences Matter

✅ The second carpenter has mastered their skills over decades, mastering the ability to work efficiently under pressure.

✅ With better site logistics and tools, they don’t waste time moving materials manually. A hoist or crane can deliver everything they need exactly when and where they need it.

✅ They also have access to standardized procedures and best practices, reducing errors and rework.

✅ They execute tasks with high quality, eliminating the need for rework or defect correction

❌ Meanwhile, the first carpenter does not have these advantages. They work slower, with more inefficiencies and potential quality issues.

Productivity Exists on a Spectrum

Although these two examples highlight two extremes, I wanted to explain the fact that productivity exists on a spectrum. It is influenced by:

🔹 The experience and training of the workforce.
🔹 The complexity and scale of the project—a small house is not the same as a high-rise tower.
🔹 Availability of tools, equipment, and material handling systems.
🔹 Cultural and regulatory factors that impact work efficiency.
🔹 Weather conditions—harsh climates can reduce productivity significantly.

Many companies make the mistake of applying “industry-standard productivity rates” from textbooks or databases without considering these real-world factors. This can result in inaccurate cost estimates, unrealistic schedules, and project delays.

Why Standard Productivity Rates Fail in the Real World

In my years in project controls, I’ve seen countless cases where contractors or consultants rely on assumed productivity rates without validating them on-site. Here’s what usually happens:

1. Overly Optimistic Estimates – The project team assumes a productivity rate based on ideal conditions, not actual site conditions. This results in unrealistic schedules.
2. Unexpected Delays – When the real productivity turns out to be lower, the project falls behind, causing significant delays.
3. Cost Overruns – Labor costs increase as workers take longer than expected to complete tasks.
4. Disputes and Claims – The stakeholders argue over unrealistic targets, leading to potential conflicts.

Here is a better approach. Measure actual productivity on your projects instead of relying on outdated, generic assumptions.

How to Accurately Measure Productivity

🔍 Track Real Performance – Observe how long specific tasks take in YOUR company, with YOUR workforce, in YOUR environment.

📊 Benchmark Against Similar Projects – Instead of generic industry standards, compare productivity rates from similar projects in similar locations.

Final Thought

Applying a one-size-fits-all productivity rate to projects is like assuming every car gets the same fuel efficiency—it simply doesn’t reflect reality. If you want accurate estimates, stop relying on myths and start using real data.

Regards,

Osama Saad, MBA, PMP, PSP, CCP, PMI-SP

Learn More!

Enroll in our Planning Engineer and Project Control Courses